Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
BJS Open ; 5(SUPPL 1):i13, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1493709

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hip fractures are the commonest serious injury in older people, the commonest reason for older people needing surgery and the commonest cause of death following an accident. The NHFD is a national database whereby markers of care are recorded prospectively for patients over 60 years sustaining a hip fracture and requiring inpatient care, with a Best Practice Tariff linked to key performance indicators. The aim of this study was to review how care varied for patients sustaining a hip fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the equivalent time last year. Methods: Using the NHFD we compared data from March-May 2019 to the same period in 2020 during the pandemic at St George's Hospital. The study provides a snapshot of care during the pandemic. Results: Therewere more admissions andmore discharges during the pandemic. There was an increase in time to theatre and subsequent reduction in BPT. There was also an increase in non-operative treatment for these patients. 6 patients were confirmed COVID-19 positive, one of whom died. Therewas a reduction in time to ortho-geriatrician review and also a reduction in deliriumreview post-operatively. Length of staywas also reduced. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had an effect on care provided to hip fracture patients. There was an increase in time and a deterioration in orthogeriatric review within 72 hours. The length of stay however improved due to improved focus on pathways and discharge processes. There was also a lower threshold to offer non-operative care wherever possible.

2.
J Hosp Infect ; 113: 180-186, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1275476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Public Health England guidance stipulates the use of filtering facepiece (FFP3) masks for healthcare workers engaged in aerosol-generating procedures. Mask fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers from aerosolized particles. AIM: To analyse the outcome of mask fit-testing across National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Using the Freedom of Information Act, 137 NHS hospitals were approached on May 26th, 2020 by an independent researcher to provide data on the outcome of fit-testing at each site. FINDINGS: Ninety-six hospitals responded to the request between May 26th, 2020 to October 29th, 2020. There was a total of 86 mask types used across 56 hospitals, 13 of which were used in at least 10% of these hospitals; the most frequently used was the FFP3M1863, used by 92.86% of hospitals. Overall fit-testing pass rates were provided by 32 hospitals with mean pass rate of 80.74%. The most successful masks, in terms of fit-test failure rates, were the Alpha Solway 3030V and the Alpha Solway S-3V (both reporting mean fit-test failures of 2%). Male- and female-specific pass and failure rates were provided by seven hospitals. Across the seven hospitals, 20.1% of men tested failed the fit-test for all masks used, whereas 19.9% of women tested failed the fit-test for all masks used. Failure rates were significantly higher in staff from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds 644/2507 (25.69%) across four hospitals. CONCLUSION: Twenty percent of healthcare workers tested during the first response to the pandemic failed fit-testing for masks. A small sample revealed that this was most prominent in staff from BAME backgrounds.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Masks/standards , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , State Medicine , United Kingdom
3.
Knee ; 27(3): A1, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-611753
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL